[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210928115142.GH964074@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:51:42 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Mark Zhang <markzhang@...dia.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
Naresh Kumar PBS <nareshkumar.pbs@...adcom.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@...lsio.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 04/11] RDMA/counter: Add an is_disabled
field in struct rdma_hw_stats
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:28:39AM +0800, Mark Zhang wrote:
> On 9/28/2021 12:53 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 02:07:23AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
> > > index 3f6b98a87566..67519730b1ac 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
> > > @@ -968,15 +968,21 @@ static int fill_stat_counter_hwcounters(struct sk_buff *msg,
> > > if (!table_attr)
> > > return -EMSGSIZE;
> > > @@ -601,11 +604,20 @@ static inline struct rdma_hw_stats *rdma_alloc_hw_stats_struct(
> > > if (!stats)
> > > return NULL;
> > > + stats->is_disabled = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(num_counters),
> > > + sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!stats->is_disabled)
> > > + goto err;
> > > +
> >
> > Please de-inline this function and make a rdma_free_hw_stats_struct()
> > call to pair with it. The hw_stats_data kfree should be in there. If
> > you do this as a precursor patch this patch will be much smaller.
> >
> > Also, the
> >
> > stats = kzalloc(sizeof(*stats) + num_counters * sizeof(u64),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Should be using array_size
> Maybe use struct_size:
> stats = kzalloc(struct_size(stats, value, num_counters), GFP_KERNEL);
Right
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists