[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d71e2841-43b1-9be2-40f5-e9fb50400904@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 20:51:11 +0800
From: Mark Zhang <markzhang@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
Naresh Kumar PBS <nareshkumar.pbs@...adcom.com>,
Neta Ostrovsky <netao@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@...lsio.com>,
"Saeed Mahameed" <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 06/11] RDMA/nldev: Add support to get status
of all counters
On 9/28/2021 7:52 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 05:12:39PM +0800, Mark Zhang wrote:
>> On 9/28/2021 1:30 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 02:07:25AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>> +static int stat_get_doit_default_counter(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>> + struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
>>>> + struct nlattr *tb[])
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct rdma_hw_stats *stats;
>>>> + struct ib_device *device;
>>>> + u32 index, port;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_DEV_INDEX] || !tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PORT_INDEX])
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + index = nla_get_u32(tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_DEV_INDEX]);
>>>> + device = ib_device_get_by_index(sock_net(skb->sk), index);
>>>> + if (!device)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + port = nla_get_u32(tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_PORT_INDEX]);
>>>> + if (!rdma_is_port_valid(device, port)) {
>>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> + goto end;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + stats = ib_get_hw_stats_port(device, port);
>>>> + if (!stats) {
>>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> + goto end;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_HWCOUNTER_DYNAMIC])
>>>> + ret = stat_get_doit_stats_list(skb, nlh, extack, tb,
>>>> + device, port, stats);
>>>> + else
>>>> + ret = stat_get_doit_stats_values(skb, nlh, extack, tb, device,
>>>> + port, stats);
>>>
>>> This seems strange, why is the output of a get contingent on a ignored
>>> input attribute? Shouldn't the HWCOUNTER_DYNAMIC just always be
>>> emitted?
>>
>> The CMD_STAT_GET is originally used to get the default hwcounter statistic
>> (the value of all hwstats), now we also want to use this command to get a
>> list of counters (just name and status), so kernel differentiates these 2
>> cases based on HWCOUNTER_DYNAMIC attr.
>
> Don't do that, it is not how netlink works. Either the whole attribute
> should be returned or you need a new get command
Will add a new get command for backward compatibility, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists