[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210928141718.GC25415@fieldses.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:17:18 -0400
From: "bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>
Cc: "neilb@...e.com" <neilb@...e.com>,
"kolga@...app.com" <kolga@...app.com>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"tyhicks@...onical.com" <tyhicks@...onical.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"wanghai38@...wei.com" <wanghai38@...wei.com>,
"nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com" <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"jlayton@...nel.org" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"dsahern@...il.com" <dsahern@...il.com>,
"christian.brauner@...ntu.com" <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"anna.schumaker@...app.com" <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"cong.wang@...edance.com" <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
"chuck.lever@...cle.com" <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
"kuniyu@...zon.co.jp" <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
"timo@...henpieler.org" <timo@...henpieler.org>,
"jiang.wang@...edance.com" <jiang.wang@...edance.com>,
"wenbin.zeng@...il.com" <wenbin.zeng@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rao.Shoaib@...cle.com" <Rao.Shoaib@...cle.com>,
"jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com" <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
"tom@...pey.com" <tom@...pey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] auth_gss: Fix deadlock that blocks
rpcsec_gss_exit_net when use-gss-proxy==1
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 02:04:49PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 09:49 -0400, bfields@...ldses.org wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 01:30:17PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 11:14 +0800, Wang Hai wrote:
> > > > When use-gss-proxy is set to 1, write_gssp() creates a rpc client
> > > > in
> > > > gssp_rpc_create(), this increases the netns refcount by 2, these
> > > > refcounts are supposed to be released in rpcsec_gss_exit_net(),
> > > > but
> > > > it
> > > > will never happen because rpcsec_gss_exit_net() is triggered only
> > > > when
> > > > the netns refcount gets to 0, specifically:
> > > > refcount=0 -> cleanup_net() -> ops_exit_list ->
> > > > rpcsec_gss_exit_net
> > > > It is a deadlock situation here, refcount will never get to 0
> > > > unless
> > > > rpcsec_gss_exit_net() is called. So, in this case, the netns
> > > > refcount
> > > > should not be increased.
> > > >
> > > > In this case, xprt will take a netns refcount which is not
> > > > supposed
> > > > to be taken. Add a new flag to rpc_create_args called
> > > > RPC_CLNT_CREATE_NO_NET_REF for not increasing the netns refcount.
> > > >
> > > > It is safe not to hold the netns refcount, because when
> > > > cleanup_net(), it
> > > > will hold the gssp_lock and then shut down the rpc client
> > > > synchronously.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I don't like this solution at all. Adding this kind of flag is
> > > going to
> > > lead to problems down the road.
> > >
> > > Is there any reason whatsoever why we need this RPC client to exist
> > > when there is no active knfsd server? IOW: Is there any reason why
> > > we
> > > shouldn't defer creating this RPC client for when knfsd starts up
> > > in
> > > this net namespace, and why we can't shut it down when knfsd shuts
> > > down?
> >
> > The rpc create is done in the context of the process that writes to
> > /proc/net/rpc/use-gss-proxy to get the right namespaces. I don't
> > know
> > how hard it would be capture that information for a later create.
> >
>
> svcauth_gss_proxy_init() uses the net namespace SVC_NET(rqstp) (i.e.
> the knfsd namespace) in the call to gssp_accept_sec_context_upcall().
>
> IOW: the net namespace used in the call to find the RPC client is the
> one set up by knfsd, and so if use-gss-proxy was set in a different
> namespace than the one used by knfsd, then it won't be found.
Right. If you've got multiple containers, you don't want to find a
gss-proxy from a different container.
--b.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists