netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net/mlx5e: check return value of rhashtable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7ae9f8f7-c6df-13be-f240-81d5bd4af57c@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Sep 2021 14:00:58 +0300
From:   Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
To:     MichelleJin <shjy180909@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        <johannes@...solutions.net>
CC:     <saeedm@...dia.com>, <leon@...nel.org>, <paulb@...dia.com>,
        <ozsh@...dia.com>, <lariel@...dia.com>, <cmi@...dia.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net/mlx5e: check return value of
 rhashtable_init



On 2021-09-27 6:34 AM, MichelleJin wrote:
> When rhashtable_init() fails, it returns -EINVAL.
> However, since error return value of rhashtable_init is not checked,
> it can cause use of uninitialized pointers.
> So, fix unhandled errors of rhashtable_init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: MichelleJin <shjy180909@...il.com>
> ---
> 
> v1->v2:
>   - change commit message
>   - fix unneeded destroying of ht
> v2->v3:
>   - nothing changed
> v3->v4:
>   - nothing changed
> 
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c
> index 6c949abcd2e1..225748a9e52a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c
> @@ -2127,12 +2127,20 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_init(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5_fs_chains *chains,
>   
>   	ct_priv->post_act = post_act;
>   	mutex_init(&ct_priv->control_lock);
> -	rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->zone_ht, &zone_params);
> -	rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_ht, &tuples_ht_params);
> -	rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_nat_ht, &tuples_nat_ht_params);
> +	if (rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->zone_ht, &zone_params))
> +		goto err_ct_zone_ht;
> +	if (rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_ht, &tuples_ht_params))
> +		goto err_ct_tuples_ht;
> +	if (rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_nat_ht, &tuples_nat_ht_params))
> +		goto err_ct_tuples_nat_ht;
>   
>   	return ct_priv;
>   
> +err_ct_tuples_nat_ht:
> +	rhashtable_destroy(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_ht);
> +err_ct_tuples_ht:
> +	rhashtable_destroy(&ct_priv->zone_ht);
> +err_ct_zone_ht:
>   err_ct_nat_tbl:
>   	mlx5_chains_destroy_global_table(chains, ct_priv->ct);
>   err_ct_tbl:
> 

Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>