lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211001113528.79f35460@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Oct 2021 11:35:28 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, shayagr@...zon.com,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        "Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 bpf-next 00/18] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer
 support

On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 11:03:58 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Can you please check if the code above is aligned to current requirements or if
> it is missing something?
> If this code it is fine, I guess we have two option here:
> - integrate the commits above in xdp multi-buff series (posting v15) and work on
>   the verfier code in parallel (if xdp_mb_pointer helper is not required from day0)
> - integrate verfier changes in xdp multi-buff series, drop bpf_xdp_load_bytes
>   helper (probably we will still need bpf_xdp_store_bytes) and introduce
>   bpf_xdp_pointer as new ebpf helper.

It wasn't clear to me that we wanted bpf_xdp_load_bytes() to exist.
But FWIW no preference here.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ