netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v2 9/9] selftests/bpf: better clean up for runqslower in test_bpftool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211001110856.14730-10-quentin@isovalent.com>
Date:   Fri,  1 Oct 2021 12:08:56 +0100
From:   Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 9/9] selftests/bpf: better clean up for runqslower in test_bpftool_build.sh

The script test_bpftool_build.sh attempts to build bpftool in the
various supported ways, to make sure nothing breaks.

One of those ways is to run "make tools/bpf" from the root of the kernel
repository. This command builds bpftool, along with the other tools
under tools/bpf, and runqslower in particular. After running the
command and upon a successful bpftool build, the script attempts to
cleanup the generated objects. However, after building with this target
and in the case of runqslower, the files are not cleaned up as expected.

This is because the "tools/bpf" target sets $(OUTPUT) to
.../tools/bpf/runqslower/ when building the tool, causing the object
files to be placed directly under the runqslower directory. But when
running "cd tools/bpf; make clean", the value for $(OUTPUT) is set to
".output" (relative to the runqslower directory) by runqslower's
Makefile, and this is where the Makefile looks for files to clean up.

We cannot easily fix in the root Makefile (where "tools/bpf" is defined)
or in tools/scripts/Makefile.include (setting $(OUTPUT)), where changing
the way the output variables are passed would likely have consequences
elsewhere. We could change runqslower's Makefile to build in the
repository instead of in a dedicated ".output/", but doing so just to
accommodate a test script doesn't sound great. Instead, let's just make
sure that we clean up runqslower properly by adding the correct command
to the script.

This will attempt to clean runqslower twice: the first try with command
"cd tools/bpf; make clean" will search for tools/bpf/runqslower/.output
and fail to clean it (but will still clean the other tools, in
particular bpftool), the second one (added in this commit) sets the
$(OUTPUT) variable like for building with the "tool/bpf" target and
should succeed.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_build.sh | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_build.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_build.sh
index b03a87571592..1453a53ed547 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_build.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_build.sh
@@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ echo -e "... through kbuild\n"

 if [ -f ".config" ] ; then
 	make_and_clean tools/bpf
+	## "make tools/bpf" sets $(OUTPUT) to ...tools/bpf/runqslower for
+	## runqslower, but the default (used for the "clean" target) is .output.
+	## Let's make sure we clean runqslower's directory properly.
+	make -C tools/bpf/runqslower OUTPUT=${KDIR_ROOT_DIR}/tools/bpf/runqslower/ clean

 	## $OUTPUT is overwritten in kbuild Makefile, and thus cannot be passed
 	## down from toplevel Makefile to bpftool's Makefile.
-- 
2.30.2