lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUj7h0L7xE=CY0zHTJ=VzJ-Cmy6foJQvvpTv1aixLwY6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:00:39 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        Yucong Sun <sunyucong@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf v2 3/4] net: implement ->sock_is_readable for UDP and AF_UNIX

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:44 PM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote:
> > +bool sk_msg_is_readable(struct sock *sk)
> > +{
> > +     struct sk_psock *psock;
> > +     bool empty = true;
> > +
> > +     psock = sk_psock_get_checked(sk);
>
> We shouldn't need the checked version here right? We only get here because
> we hooked the sk with the callbacks from *_bpf_rebuild_rpotos. Then we
> can just use sk_psock() and save a few extra insns/branch.

Good catch! Indeed only sockmap overwrites that hook.

I will send V3 shortly after all tests are done.

Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ