lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 2 Oct 2021 21:27:11 +0100
From:   Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] bpf: iterators: install libbpf headers
 when building

On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 00:20, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 4:09 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com> wrote:
> >
> > API headers from libbpf should not be accessed directly from the
> > library's source directory. Instead, they should be exported with "make
> > install_headers". Let's make sure that bpf/preload/iterators/Makefile
> > installs the headers properly when building.

> >
> > -$(BPFOBJ): $(wildcard $(LIBBPF_SRC)/*.[ch] $(LIBBPF_SRC)/Makefile) | $(OUTPUT)
> > +$(BPFOBJ): $(wildcard $(LIBBPF_SRC)/*.[ch] $(LIBBPF_SRC)/Makefile)            \
> > +          | $(LIBBPF_OUTPUT) $(LIBBPF_INCLUDE)
>
> Would it make sense for libbpf's Makefile to create include and output
> directories on its own? We wouldn't need to have these order-only
> dependencies everywhere, right?

Good point, I'll have a look at it.
Quentin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ