[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACdoK4LL91u-JK1fZ3XvkrTXsKBVsN-y1Js4QSPkWyS51KPB8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 21:27:11 +0100
From: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] bpf: iterators: install libbpf headers
when building
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 00:20, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 4:09 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com> wrote:
> >
> > API headers from libbpf should not be accessed directly from the
> > library's source directory. Instead, they should be exported with "make
> > install_headers". Let's make sure that bpf/preload/iterators/Makefile
> > installs the headers properly when building.
> >
> > -$(BPFOBJ): $(wildcard $(LIBBPF_SRC)/*.[ch] $(LIBBPF_SRC)/Makefile) | $(OUTPUT)
> > +$(BPFOBJ): $(wildcard $(LIBBPF_SRC)/*.[ch] $(LIBBPF_SRC)/Makefile) \
> > + | $(LIBBPF_OUTPUT) $(LIBBPF_INCLUDE)
>
> Would it make sense for libbpf's Makefile to create include and output
> directories on its own? We wouldn't need to have these order-only
> dependencies everywhere, right?
Good point, I'll have a look at it.
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists