lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211003222312.284175-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date:   Mon,  4 Oct 2021 01:23:11 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: tag_dsa: send packets with TX fwd offload from VLAN-unaware bridges using VID 0

The present code is structured this way due to an incomplete thought
process. In Documentation/networking/switchdev.rst we document that if a
bridge is VLAN-unaware, then the presence or lack of a pvid on a bridge
port (or on the bridge itself, for that matter) should not affect the
ability to receive and transmit tagged or untagged packets.

If the bridge on behalf of which we are sending this packet is
VLAN-aware, then the TX forwarding offload API ensures that the skb will
be VLAN-tagged (if the packet was sent by user space as untagged, it
will get transmitted town to the driver as tagged with the bridge
device's pvid). But if the bridge is VLAN-unaware, it may or may not be
VLAN-tagged. In fact the logic to insert the bridge's PVID came from the
idea that we should emulate what is being done in the VLAN-aware case.
But we shouldn't.

It appears that injecting packets using a VLAN ID of 0 serves the
purpose of forwarding the packets to the egress port with no VLAN tag
added or stripped by the hardware, and no filtering being performed.
So we can simply remove the superfluous logic.

There are in fact two independent reasons why having this logic is broken:

(1) When CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING=n, we call br_vlan_get_pvid_rcu()
    but that returns an error and we do error out, dropping all packets
    on xmit. Not really smart. This is also an issue when the user
    deletes the bridge pvid:

    $ bridge vlan del dev br0 vid 1 self

    As mentioned, in both cases, packets should still flow freely, and
    they do just that on any net device where the bridge is not offloaded,
    but on mv88e6xxx they don't.

(2) that code actually triggers a lockdep warning due to the fact that
    it dereferences bridge private data that assumes rcu_preempt protection
    (rcu_read_lock), but rcu_read_lock is not actually held during
    .ndo_start_xmit, but rather rcu_read_lock_bh (rcu_bh), which has its
    own lockdep keys.

The solution to both problems is the same: delete the broken code.

Fixes: d82f8ab0d874 ("net: dsa: tag_dsa: offload the bridge forwarding process")
Reported-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211003155141.2241314-1-andrew@lunn.ch/
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210928233708.1246774-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
 net/dsa/tag_dsa.c | 20 ++------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c b/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c
index 77d0ce89ab77..7e35bcda91c9 100644
--- a/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c
+++ b/net/dsa/tag_dsa.c
@@ -129,12 +129,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *dsa_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 	u8 tag_dev, tag_port;
 	enum dsa_cmd cmd;
 	u8 *dsa_header;
-	u16 pvid = 0;
-	int err;
 
 	if (skb->offload_fwd_mark) {
 		struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = dp->ds->dst;
-		struct net_device *br = dp->bridge_dev;
 
 		cmd = DSA_CMD_FORWARD;
 
@@ -144,19 +141,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *dsa_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 		 */
 		tag_dev = dst->last_switch + 1 + dp->bridge_num;
 		tag_port = 0;
-
-		/* If we are offloading forwarding for a VLAN-unaware bridge,
-		 * inject packets to hardware using the bridge's pvid, since
-		 * that's where the packets ingressed from.
-		 */
-		if (!br_vlan_enabled(br)) {
-			/* Safe because __dev_queue_xmit() runs under
-			 * rcu_read_lock_bh()
-			 */
-			err = br_vlan_get_pvid_rcu(br, &pvid);
-			if (err)
-				return NULL;
-		}
 	} else {
 		cmd = DSA_CMD_FROM_CPU;
 		tag_dev = dp->ds->index;
@@ -188,8 +172,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *dsa_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 
 		dsa_header[0] = (cmd << 6) | tag_dev;
 		dsa_header[1] = tag_port << 3;
-		dsa_header[2] = pvid >> 8;
-		dsa_header[3] = pvid & 0xff;
+		dsa_header[2] = 0;
+		dsa_header[3] = 0;
 	}
 
 	return skb;
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ