[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXSeCA+27xiXAgwRUi4wFukXkrttTvnEGhZAtq7p_trCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 09:10:39 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@...russia.ru>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Yuusuke Ashizuka <ashiduka@...itsu.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>,
        Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] ravb: Add support for RZ/G2L SoC
Hi Biju,
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 8:51 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] ravb: Add support for RZ/G2L SoC
> > On 10/1/21 6:06 PM, Biju Das wrote:
> > > RZ/G2L SoC has Gigabit Ethernet IP consisting of Ethernet controller
> > > (E-MAC), Internal TCP/IP Offload Engine (TOE) and Dedicated Direct
> > > memory access controller (DMAC).
> > >
> > > This patch adds compatible string for RZ/G2L and fills up the
> > > ravb_hw_info struct. Function stubs are added which will be used by
> > > gbeth_hw_info and will be filled incrementally.
> >
> >    I've always been against this patch -- we get a support for the GbEther
> > whihc doesn't work after this patch. I believe we should have the GbEther
> > support in the last patch. of the overall series.
>
> This is the common practice. We use bricks to build a wall. The function stubs are just
> Bricks.
>
> After filling stubs, we will add SoC dt and board DT, after that one will get GBsupport on
> RZ/G2L platform.
Not "after", but "in parallel".  The stubs will be filled in through
the netdev tree (1), while SoC DT and board DT will go through the
renesas-devel and soc trees (2).
So our main worry is: what happens if you have (2) but not (1)?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
                        Geert
-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
