[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVxdRHvpiHVpdu4H@sellars>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:12:20 +0200
From: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@...3.blue>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@....qualcomm.com>,
ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"John W . Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
Simon Wunderlich <sw@...onwunderlich.de>,
Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ath9k: interrupt fixes on queue reset
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 09:25:12PM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following are two patches for ath9k to fix a potential interrupt
> storm (PATCH 2/3) and to fix potentially resetting the wifi chip while
> its interrupts were accidentally reenabled (PATCH 3/3).
>
> PATCH 1/3 adds the possibility to trigger the ath9k queue reset through
> the ath9k reset file in debugfs. Which was helpful to reproduce and debug
> this issue and might help for future debugging.
>
> PATCH 2/3 and PATCH 3/3 should be applicable for stable.
>
> Regards, Linus
>
I've marked PATCH 3/3 as "rejected" in Patchwork now due to
Felix's legitimate remarks. For patches 1/3 and and 2/3 I'd
still like to see them merged upstream if there is no objection
to those.
Regars, Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists