[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211005124209.42fefb03@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 12:42:09 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
coreteam@...filter.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] rcu: Use typeof(p) instead of typeof(*p) *
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 09:18:04 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 6:47 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > Also had to update a lot of the function pointer initialization in the
> > networking code, as a function address must be passed as an argument in
> > RCU_INIT_POINTER() and not just the function name, otherwise the following
> > error occurs:
>
> Ugh.
>
> I think this is a sign of why we did it the way we did with that odd
> "typeof(*p)*" thing in the first place.
>
Oh, which was also compiler specific.
On my fedora box, which has:
gcc version 10.3.1 20210422 (Red Hat 10.3.1-1) (GCC)
It compiled fine, with no errors.
But on my Debian box with:
gcc version 10.2.1 20210110 (Debian 10.2.1-6)
The function pointers were an issue :-/
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists