lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <fa42c09f424b93f6b73d6c3ea42a240cb4b4464a.1633392335.git.Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue,  5 Oct 2021 01:26:50 -0700
From:   Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@...il.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tony Ambardar <Tony.Ambardar@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>,
        Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
        Hassan Naveed <hnaveed@...ecomp.com>,
        David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
        Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 06/16] MIPS: eBPF: fix JIT static analysis hang with bounded loops

Support for bounded loops allowed the verifier to output backward jumps
such as BPF_JMP_A(-4). These trap the JIT's static analysis in a loop,
resulting in a system hang and eventual RCU stall.

Fix by updating reg_val_propagate_range() to skip backward jumps when in
fallthrough mode and if the jump target has been visited already.

Trigger the bug using the test_verifier test "bounded loop that jumps out
rather than in".

Fixes: 2589726d12a1 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops")
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <Tony.Ambardar@...il.com>
---
 arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c b/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
index 0928d86cb3b0..b8dc6cebefab 100644
--- a/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
@@ -1693,6 +1693,10 @@ static int reg_val_propagate_range(struct jit_ctx *ctx, u64 initial_rvt,
 				rvt[prog->len] = exit_rvt;
 				return idx;
 			case BPF_JA:
+			{
+				int tgt = idx + 1 + insn->off;
+				bool visited = (rvt[tgt] & RVT_FALL_THROUGH);
+
 				rvt[idx] |= RVT_DONE;
 				/*
 				 * Verifier dead code patching can use
@@ -1702,8 +1706,16 @@ static int reg_val_propagate_range(struct jit_ctx *ctx, u64 initial_rvt,
 				 */
 				if (insn->off == -1)
 					break;
+				/*
+				 * Bounded loops cause the same issues in
+				 * fallthrough mode; follow only if jump
+				 * target is unvisited to mitigate.
+				 */
+				if (insn->off < 0 && !follow_taken && visited)
+					break;
 				idx += insn->off;
 				break;
+			}
 			case BPF_JEQ:
 			case BPF_JGT:
 			case BPF_JGE:
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ