[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YV7dqcCbxaeBcELY@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 14:44:41 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] lib/rhashtable: Replace kernel.h with the
necessary inclusions
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 07:23:28PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 12:51:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > When kernel.h is used in the headers it adds a lot into dependency hell,
> > especially when there are circular dependencies are involved.
> > Replace kernel.h inclusion with the list of what is really being used.
> Nack. I can see the benefits of splitting things out of kernel.h
> but there is no reason to add crap to end users like rhashtable.c.
Crap is in the kernel.h. Could you elaborate how making a proper list
of the inclusions is a crap?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists