[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211007155800.1ff26948@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 15:58:00 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
mlxsw@...dia.com, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] devlink: Reduce struct devlink exposure
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 09:55:15 +0300
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> +void *devlink_priv(struct devlink *devlink)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(!devlink);
Do we really want to bring down the kernel in this case?
Can't we just have:
if (WARN_ON(!devlink))
return NULL;
?
Same for the below as well.
-- Steve
> + return &devlink->priv;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_priv);
> +
> +struct devlink *priv_to_devlink(void *priv)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(!priv);
> + return container_of(priv, struct devlink, priv);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(priv_to_devlink);
> +
> +struct device *devlink_to_dev(const struct devlink *devlink)
> +{
> + return devlink->dev;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_to_dev);
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists