lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211007050231.728496-1-songliubraving@fb.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Oct 2021 22:02:31 -0700
From:   Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
        <kernel-team@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: skip the second half of get_branch_snapshot in vm

VMs running on latest kernel support LBR. However, bpf_get_branch_snapshot
couldn't stop the LBR before too many entries are flushed. Skip the
hit/waste test for VMs before we find a proper fix for LBR in VM.

Fixes: 025bd7c753aa ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_branch_snapshot")
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>

---
Changes v1 => v2:
1. Move the is_hypervisor() check to later in the test, so that we still
   Run the first half of the test in vm
2. Use strncmp instead of strstr. (Andrii)
3. Fix the Fixes tag. (Andrii)
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/get_branch_snapshot.c      | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_branch_snapshot.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_branch_snapshot.c
index 67e86f8d86775..e4f92feb7b32c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_branch_snapshot.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_branch_snapshot.c
@@ -6,6 +6,30 @@
 static int *pfd_array;
 static int cpu_cnt;
 
+static bool is_hypervisor(void)
+{
+	char *line = NULL;
+	bool ret = false;
+	size_t len;
+	FILE *fp;
+
+	fp = fopen("/proc/cpuinfo", "r");
+	if (!fp)
+		return false;
+
+	while (getline(&line, &len, fp) != -1) {
+		if (!strncmp(line, "flags", 5)) {
+			if (strstr(line, "hypervisor") != NULL)
+				ret = true;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	free(line);
+	fclose(fp);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int create_perf_events(void)
 {
 	struct perf_event_attr attr = {0};
@@ -83,6 +107,16 @@ void test_get_branch_snapshot(void)
 		goto cleanup;
 	}
 
+	if (is_hypervisor()) {
+		/* As of today, LBR in hypervisor cannot be stopped before
+		 * too many entries are flushed. Skip the hit/waste test
+		 * for now in hypervisor until we optimize the LBR in
+		 * hypervisor.
+		 */
+		test__skip();
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+
 	ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->test1_hits, 6, "find_looptest_in_lbr");
 
 	/* Given we stop LBR in software, we will waste a few entries.
-- 
2.30.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ