lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:33:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] kernel.h further split

On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 12:51:25PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The kernel.h is a set of something which is not related to each other
> and often used in non-crossed compilation units, especially when drivers
> need only one or two macro definitions from it.
> 
> Here is the split of container_of(). The goals are the following:
> - untwist the dependency hell a bit
> - drop kernel.h inclusion where it's only used for container_of()
> - speed up C preprocessing.
> 
> People, like Greg KH and Miguel Ojeda, were asking about the latter.
> Read below the methodology and test setup with outcome numbers.
> 
> The methodology
> ===============
> The question here is how to measure in the more or less clean way
> the C preprocessing time when building a project like Linux kernel.
> To answer it, let's look around and see what tools do we have that
> may help. Aha, here is ccache tool that seems quite plausible to
> be used. Its core idea is to preprocess C file, count hash (MD4)
> and compare to ones that are in the cache. If found, return the
> object file, avoiding compilation stage.
> 
> Taking into account the property of the ccache, configure and use
> it in the below steps:
> 
> 1. Configure kernel with allyesconfig
> 
> 2. Make it with `make` to be sure that the cache is filled with
>    the latest data. I.o.w. warm up the cache.
> 
> 3. Run `make -s` (silent mode to reduce the influence of
>    the unrelated things, like console output) 10 times and
>    measure 'real' time spent.
> 
> 4. Repeat 1-3 for each patch or patch set to get data sets before
>    and after.
> 
> When we get the raw data, calculating median will show us the number.
> Comparing them before and after we will see the difference.
> 
> The setup
> =========
> I have used the Intel x86_64 server platform (see partial output of
>  `lscpu` below):
> 
> $ lscpu
> Architecture:            x86_64
>   CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
>   Address sizes:         46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>   Byte Order:            Little Endian
> CPU(s):                  88
>   On-line CPU(s) list:   0-87
> Vendor ID:               GenuineIntel
>   Model name:            Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
>     CPU family:          6
>     Model:               79
>     Thread(s) per core:  2
>     Core(s) per socket:  22
>     Socket(s):           2
>     Stepping:            1
>     CPU max MHz:         3600.0000
>     CPU min MHz:         1200.0000
> ...
> Caches (sum of all):
>   L1d:                   1.4 MiB (44 instances)
>   L1i:                   1.4 MiB (44 instances)
>   L2:                    11 MiB (44 instances)
>   L3:                    110 MiB (2 instances)
> NUMA:
>   NUMA node(s):          2
>   NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0-21,44-65
>   NUMA node1 CPU(s):     22-43,66-87
> Vulnerabilities:
>   Itlb multihit:         KVM: Mitigation: Split huge pages
>   L1tf:                  Mitigation; PTE Inversion; VMX conditional cache flushes, SMT vulnerable
>   Mds:                   Mitigation; Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable
>   Meltdown:              Mitigation; PTI
>   Spec store bypass:     Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl and seccomp
>   Spectre v1:            Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
>   Spectre v2:            Mitigation; Full generic retpoline, IBPB conditional, IBRS_FW, STIBP conditional, RSB filling
>   Tsx async abort:       Mitigation; Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable
> 
> With the following GCC:
> 
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (Debian 10.3.0-11) 10.3.0
> 
> The commands I have run during the measurement were:
> 
> 	rm -rf $O
> 	make O=$O allyesconfig
> 	time make O=$O -s -j64	# this step has been measured
> 
> The raw data and median
> =======================
> Before patch 2 (yes, I have measured the only patch 2 effect) in the series
> (the data is sorted by time):
> 
> real    2m8.794s
> real    2m11.183s
> real    2m11.235s
> real    2m11.639s
> real    2m11.960s
> real    2m12.014s
> real    2m12.609s
> real    2m13.177s
> real    2m13.462s
> real    2m19.132s
> 
> After patch 2 has been applied:
> 
> real    2m8.536s
> real    2m8.776s
> real    2m9.071s
> real    2m9.459s
> real    2m9.531s
> real    2m9.610s
> real    2m10.356s
> real    2m10.430s
> real    2m11.117s
> real    2m11.885s
> 
> Median values are:
> 	131.987s before
> 	129.571s after
> 
> We see the steady speedup as of 1.83%.

You do know about kcbench:
	https://gitlab.com/knurd42/kcbench.git

Try running that to make it such that we know how it was tested :)

thanks,

greg k-h


> 
> Andy Shevchenko (4):
>   kernel.h: Drop unneeded <linux/kernel.h> inclusion from other headers
>   kernel.h: Split out container_of() and typeof_member() macros
>   lib/rhashtable: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions
>   kunit: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions
> 
>  include/kunit/test.h         | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/container_of.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/kernel.h       | 31 +-----------------------------
>  include/linux/kobject.h      |  1 +
>  include/linux/list.h         |  6 ++++--
>  include/linux/llist.h        |  4 +++-
>  include/linux/plist.h        |  5 ++++-
>  include/linux/rwsem.h        |  1 -
>  include/linux/spinlock.h     |  1 -
>  include/media/media-entity.h |  3 ++-
>  lib/radix-tree.c             |  6 +++++-
>  lib/rhashtable.c             |  7 ++++++-
>  12 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/container_of.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.33.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ