[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <163372560794.10596.8697420048010685781.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 20:40:07 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Hou Tao <hotforest@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, yhs@...com, kafai@...com, mingo@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, houtao1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] add support for writable bare tracepoint
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:48:54 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> The patchset series supports writable context for bare tracepoint.
>
> The main idea comes from patchset "writable contexts for bpf raw
> tracepoints" [1], but it only supports normal tracepoint with
> associated trace event under tracefs. Now we have one use case
> in which we add bare tracepoint in VFS layer, and update
> file::f_mode for specific files. The reason using bare tracepoint
> is that it doesn't form a ABI and we can change it freely. So
> add support for it in BPF.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v5,1/3] bpf: support writable context for bare tracepoint
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/65223741ae1b
- [bpf-next,v5,2/3] libbpf: support detecting and attaching of writable tracepoint program
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ccaf12d6215a
- [bpf-next,v5,3/3] bpf/selftests: add test for writable bare tracepoint
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fa7f17d066bd
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists