[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <274013cd-29e4-9202-423b-bd2b2222d6b8@systemli.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 12:37:53 +0200
From: Nick <vincent@...temli.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: nbd@....name, lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com, ryder.lee@...iatek.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, shayne.chen@...iatek.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mt76: mt7615: mt7622: fix ibss and meshpoint
On 10/9/21 10:32, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Nick Hainke <vincent@...temli.org> writes:
>
>> Fixes: d8d59f66d136 ("mt76: mt7615: support 16 interfaces").
> The fixes tag should be in the end, before Signed-off-by tags. But I can
> fix that during commit.
Thanks for feedback. Already changed that locally but I did not want to
spam you with another RFC v3. :)
I was able to organize me a BPI-MT7615 PCIE Express Card. With and
without this patch beacons were sent on the mt7615 pcie, so the patch
did not make any difference. However, the mt7622 wifi will only work
with my patch.
OpenWrt buildroot says that the chips are almost the same?
|
> |This adds support for the built-in WMAC on MT7622 SoC devices which
> has the same feature set as a MT7615, but limited to 2.4 GHz only.||
I also did a version where I check for "is_mt7622(dev)", so it will only
affect the internal banana pi r64 wifi. I'm happy to insert your
feedback into my patch.
Bests
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists