netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/14] Add functional support for Gigabit Ethernet driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 10 Oct 2021 12:13:39 +0300
From:   Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To:     Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        "Adam Ford" <aford173@...il.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Add functional support for Gigabit Ethernet driver

On 10.10.2021 10:27, Biju Das wrote:

[...]
>>> The DMAC and EMAC blocks of Gigabit Ethernet IP found on RZ/G2L SoC
>>> are similar to the R-Car Ethernet AVB IP.
>>>
>>> The Gigabit Ethernet IP consists of Ethernet controller (E-MAC),
>>> Internal TCP/IP Offload Engine (TOE)  and Dedicated Direct memory
>>> access controller (DMAC).
>>>
>>> With a few changes in the driver we can support both IPs.
>>>
>>> This patch series is aims to add functional support for Gigabit
>>> Ethernet driver by filling all the stubs except set_features.
>>>
>>> set_feature patch will send as separate RFC patch along with
>>> rx_checksum patch, as it needs detailed discussion related to HW
>> checksum.
>>>
>>> Ref:-
>>>
>>> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatc
>>> hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-renesas-soc%2Flist%2F%3Fseries%3D55
>>> 7655&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cbiju.das.jz%40bp.renesas.com%7C25bc7b9155d8402
>>> a191808d98b5ae62f%7C53d82571da1947e49cb4625a166a4a2a%7C0%7C0%7C6376940
>>> 44814904836%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMz
>>> IiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=Vktj5v0GvrNf%2BDNIFs
>>> e6xjCUm6OjtzwHvK3q8aG1E5Y%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>
>>> RFC->V1:
>>>   * Removed patch#3 will send it as RFC
>>>   * Removed rx_csum functionality from patch#7, will send it as RFC
>>>   * Renamed "nc_queue" -> "nc_queues"
>>>   * Separated the comment patch into 2 separate patches.
>>>   * Documented PFRI register bit
>>>   * Added Sergy's Rb tag
>>
>>     It's Sergey. :-)
> 
> My Bad. Sorry will taken care this in future. I need to send V2, as accidentally I have added 2 macros in patch #6
> As part of RFC discussion into v1. I will send V2 to remove this.

    I'm not seeing patches #2, #4, and #9 in my inboxes... :-/

> Regards,
> Biju

MBR, Sergey