netdev - RE: [PATCH 00/14] Add functional support for Gigabit Ethernet driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 10 Oct 2021 09:25:09 +0000
From:   Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To:     Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/14] Add functional support for Gigabit Ethernet driver

Hi Sergey,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Add functional support for Gigabit Ethernet
> driver
> 
> On 10.10.2021 12:13, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> 
> [...]
> >>>> The DMAC and EMAC blocks of Gigabit Ethernet IP found on RZ/G2L SoC
> >>>> are similar to the R-Car Ethernet AVB IP.
> >>>>
> >>>> The Gigabit Ethernet IP consists of Ethernet controller (E-MAC),
> >>>> Internal TCP/IP Offload Engine (TOE)  and Dedicated Direct memory
> >>>> access controller (DMAC).
> >>>>
> >>>> With a few changes in the driver we can support both IPs.
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch series is aims to add functional support for Gigabit
> >>>> Ethernet driver by filling all the stubs except set_features.
> >>>>
> >>>> set_feature patch will send as separate RFC patch along with
> >>>> rx_checksum patch, as it needs detailed discussion related to HW
> >>> checksum.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ref:-
> >>>>
> >>>> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fp
> >>>> atc
> >>>> hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-renesas-soc%2Flist%2F%3Fseries%3
> >>>> D55
> >>>> 7655&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cbiju.das.jz%40bp.renesas.com%7C25bc7b9155d8
> >>>> 402
> >>>> a191808d98b5ae62f%7C53d82571da1947e49cb4625a166a4a2a%7C0%7C0%7C6376
> >>>> 940
> >>>> 44814904836%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2l
> >>>> uMz
> >>>> IiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=Vktj5v0GvrNf%2BDN
> >>>> IFs
> >>>> e6xjCUm6OjtzwHvK3q8aG1E5Y%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>>>
> >>>> RFC->V1:
> >>>>   * Removed patch#3 will send it as RFC
> >>>>   * Removed rx_csum functionality from patch#7, will send it as RFC
> >>>>   * Renamed "nc_queue" -> "nc_queues"
> >>>>   * Separated the comment patch into 2 separate patches.
> >>>>   * Documented PFRI register bit
> >>>>   * Added Sergy's Rb tag
> >>>
> >>>     It's Sergey. :-)
> >>
> >> My Bad. Sorry will taken care this in future. I need to send V2, as
> >> accidentally I have added 2 macros in patch #6 As part of RFC
> >> discussion into v1. I will send V2 to remove this.
> >
> >     I'm not seeing patches #2, #4, and #9 in my inboxes... :-/
> 
>     Seeing them now in the linux-renesas-soc folder in the GMail account.
> But they should have landed on the OMP account too. :-/

Can you please confirm latest series[1] lands on your OMP account?
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=560617

Regards,
Biju