[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211011060558.3af0422f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:05:58 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] ethernet: tulip: remove direct
netdev->dev_addr writes
On Fri, 08 Oct 2021 19:35:11 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
> > @@ -1821,8 +1823,7 @@ static void de21041_get_srom_info(struct de_private *de)
> > #endif
> >
> > /* store MAC address */
> > - for (i = 0; i < 6; i ++)
> > - de->dev->dev_addr[i] = ee_data[i + sa_offset];
> > + eth_hw_addr_set(de->dev, &ee_data[i + sa_offset]);
>
> what is the content of i here?
>
> Perhaps you want
>
> eth_hw_addr_set(de->dev, &ee_data[sa_offset]);
>
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/dmfe.c
> []
> > @@ -476,8 +476,7 @@ static int dmfe_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> > }
> >
> >
> > /* Set Node address */
> > - for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
> > - dev->dev_addr[i] = db->srom[20 + i];
> > + eth_hw_addr_set(dev, &db->srom[20 + i]);
>
> here too
Good catch, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists