| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20211012123056.485795-8-hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 18:00:55 +0530
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
To: naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
mpe@...erman.id.au, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: paulus@...ba.org, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v4 7/8] bpf ppc32: Add BPF_PROBE_MEM support for JIT
BPF load instruction with BPF_PROBE_MEM mode can cause a fault
inside kernel. Append exception table for such instructions
within BPF program.
Unlike other archs which uses extable 'fixup' field to pass dest_reg
and nip, BPF exception table on PowerPC follows the generic PowerPC
exception table design, where it populates both fixup and extable
sections within BPF program. fixup section contains 3 instructions,
first 2 instructions clear dest_reg (lower & higher 32-bit registers)
and last instruction jumps to next instruction in the BPF code.
extable 'insn' field contains relative offset of the instruction and
'fixup' field contains relative offset of the fixup entry. Example
layout of BPF program with extable present:
+------------------+
| |
| |
0x4020 -->| lwz r28,4(r4) |
| |
| |
0x40ac -->| lwz r3,0(r24) |
| lwz r4,4(r24) |
| |
| |
|------------------|
0x4278 -->| li r28,0 | \
| li r27,0 | | fixup entry
| b 0x4024 | /
0x4284 -->| li r4,0 |
| li r3,0 |
| b 0x40b4 |
|------------------|
0x4290 -->| insn=0xfffffd90 | \ extable entry
| fixup=0xffffffe4 | /
0x4298 -->| insn=0xfffffe14 |
| fixup=0xffffffe8 |
+------------------+
(Addresses shown here are chosen random, not real)
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
---
Changes in v4:
* Dropped explicit fallthrough statement for empty switch cases.
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 4 ++++
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 ++
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 444c9debce91..b20a2a83a6e7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -153,7 +153,11 @@ struct codegen_context {
unsigned int exentry_idx;
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
+#define BPF_FIXUP_LEN 3 /* Three instructions => 12 bytes */
+#else
#define BPF_FIXUP_LEN 2 /* Two instructions => 8 bytes */
+#endif
static inline void bpf_flush_icache(void *start, void *end)
{
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index f02457c6b54f..1a0041997050 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -297,6 +297,8 @@ int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, int pass, struct code
(ctx->exentry_idx * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4);
fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32))
+ fixup[1] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg - 1, 0); /* clear higher 32-bit register too */
fixup[BPF_FIXUP_LEN - 1] =
PPC_RAW_BRANCH((long)(pc + jmp_off) - (long)&fixup[BPF_FIXUP_LEN - 1]);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 54e7cef3e1f2..5dc45e393d1d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -813,9 +813,13 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
* BPF_LDX
*/
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B: /* dst = *(u8 *)(ul) (src + off) */
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_B:
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H: /* dst = *(u16 *)(ul) (src + off) */
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_H:
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W: /* dst = *(u32 *)(ul) (src + off) */
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_W:
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW: /* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + off) */
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_DW:
switch (size) {
case BPF_B:
EMIT(PPC_RAW_LBZ(dst_reg, src_reg, off));
@@ -834,6 +838,32 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
if (size != BPF_DW && !fp->aux->verifier_zext)
EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg_h, 0));
+
+ if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
+ int insn_idx = ctx->idx - 1;
+ int jmp_off = 4;
+
+ /*
+ * In case of BPF_DW, two lwz instructions are emitted, one
+ * for higher 32-bit and another for lower 32-bit. So, set
+ * ex->insn to the first of the two and jump over both
+ * instructions in fixup.
+ *
+ * Similarly, with !verifier_zext, two instructions are
+ * emitted for BPF_B/H/W case. So, set ex->insn to the
+ * instruction that could fault and skip over both
+ * instructions.
+ */
+ if (size == BPF_DW || !fp->aux->verifier_zext) {
+ insn_idx -= 1;
+ jmp_off += 4;
+ }
+
+ ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, pass, ctx, insn_idx,
+ jmp_off, dst_reg);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
break;
/*
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists