[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWWKuhn4FfgbcqO/@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:16:42 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 01/16] dt-bindings: net: Add pcs property
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:39:36AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 03:15:12PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > Add a property for associating PCS devices with ethernet controllers.
> > Because PCS has no generic analogue like PHY, I have left off the
> > -handle suffix.
>
> For PHYs, we used to have phy and phy-device as property names, but the
> modern name is "phy-handle". I think we should do the same here, so I
> would suggest using "pcs-handle".
On 1G and up ethernet, we have 2 PHYs. There's the external (typically)
ethernet PHY which is what the above properties are for. Then there's
the on-chip serdes PHY similar to SATA, PCIe, etc. which includes the
PCS part. For this part, we should use the generic PHY binding. I think
we already have bindings doing that.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists