netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] igb: support PEROUT and EXTTS PTP pin functions on 82580/i354/i350

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211012084904.73c8453a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:49:04 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com
Cc:     Ruud Bos <kernel.hbk@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        richardcochran@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] igb: support PEROUT and EXTTS PTP pin
 functions on 82580/i354/i350

On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:43:52 +0200 Ruud Bos wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 3:09 PM Ruud Bos <kernel.hbk@...il.com> wrote:
> > My apologies for the huge delay in resending this patch set.
> >
> > I tried  setting up my corporate e-mail to work on Linux to be able to use
> > git send-email and getting rid of the automatically appended
> > confidentiality claim. Eventually I gave up on getting this sorted, hence
> > the different e-mail address.
> >
> > Anyway, I have re-spun the patch series atop net-next.
> > Feedback is welcome.
>
> Ping?
> I did not receive any response to my patches yet.
> Does that mean I did something wrong?

These are supposed to go via Intel's trees. 
Let's point To: at Intel's maintainers.