[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OS0PR01MB59228B47A02008629DF1782A86B69@OS0PR01MB5922.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 18:28:07 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 00/14] Add functional support for Gigabit
Ethernet driver
Hi Jakub Kicinski,
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/14] Add functional support for Gigabit
> Ethernet driver
>
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:35:59 +0100 Biju Das wrote:
> > set_feature patch will send as separate RFC patch along with
> > rx_checksum patch, as it needs further discussion related to HW
> checksum.
>
> Is this part relating to the crash you observed because of TCP csum
> offload?
Yes, you are correct. Sergey, suggested use R-Car RX-HW checksum with RCSC/RCPT and
But the TOE gives either 0x0 or 0xffff as csum output and feeding this value to skb->csum
lead to kernel crash.
Regards,
Biju
>
> I'm trying to understand the situation before and after this series.
> What makes the crash possible to trigger?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists