[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <163402767629.4280.18157743138611036250@kwain>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:34:36 +0200
From: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: macb: Clean up macb_validate
Quoting Antoine Tenart (2021-10-12 10:33:04)
> Quoting Sean Anderson (2021-10-11 18:55:16)
> > As the number of interfaces grows, the number of if statements grows
> > ever more unweildy. Clean everything up a bit by using a switch
> > statement. No functional change intended.
>
> I'm not 100% convinced this makes macb_validate more readable: there are
> lots of conditions, and jumps, in the switch.
>
> Maybe you could try a mixed approach; keeping the invalid modes checks
> (bitmap_zero) at the beginning and once we know the mode is valid using
> a switch statement. That might make it easier to read as this should
> remove lots of conditionals. (We'll still have the one/_NA checks
> though).
>
> (Also having patch 1 first will improve things).
Patch 2 *
Powered by blists - more mailing lists