[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWVjtzBnhsB83H7R@salvia>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:30:15 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: ip6t_rt: fix rt0_hdr parsing in rt_mt6
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:02:04PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
> > In rt_mt6(), when it's a nonlinear skb, the 1st skb_header_pointer()
> > only copies sizeof(struct ipv6_rt_hdr) to _route that rh points to.
> > The access by ((const struct rt0_hdr *)rh)->reserved will overflow
> > the buffer. So this access should be moved below the 2nd call to
> > skb_header_pointer().
> >
> > Besides, after the 2nd skb_header_pointer(), its return value should
> > also be checked, othersize, *rp may cause null-pointer-ref.
>
> Patch looks good but I think you can just axe these pr_debug statements
> instead of moving them.
>
> Before pr_debug conversion these statments were #if-0 out, I don't think
> they'll be missed if they are removed.
Agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists