[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211014120948.31278-1-simon.horman@corigine.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com,
Yu Xiao <yu.xiao@...igine.com>,
Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>,
Niklas Soderlund <niklas.soderlund@...igine.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] nfp: bpf: relax prog rejection for mtu check through max_pkt_offset
From: Yu Xiao <yu.xiao@...igine.com>
MTU change is refused whenever the value of new MTU is bigger than
the max packet bytes that fits in NFP Cluster Target Memory (CTM).
However, a eBPF program doesn't always need to access the whole
packet data.
The maximum direct packet access (DPA) offset has always been
calculated by verifier and stored in the max_pkt_offset field of prog
aux data.
Signed-off-by: Yu Xiao <yu.xiao@...igine.com>
Reviewed-by: Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Soderlund <niklas.soderlund@...igine.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.c | 7 ++-----
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h | 2 ++
.../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.c
index 11c83a99b014..fd8c3ac2c612 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.c
@@ -182,15 +182,12 @@ static int
nfp_bpf_check_mtu(struct nfp_app *app, struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
{
struct nfp_net *nn = netdev_priv(netdev);
- unsigned int max_mtu;
if (~nn->dp.ctrl & NFP_NET_CFG_CTRL_BPF)
return 0;
- max_mtu = nn_readb(nn, NFP_NET_CFG_BPF_INL_MTU) * 64 - 32;
- if (new_mtu > max_mtu) {
- nn_info(nn, "BPF offload active, MTU over %u not supported\n",
- max_mtu);
+ if (nfp_bpf_offload_check_mtu(nn, nn->xdp_hw.prog, new_mtu)) {
+ nn_info(nn, "BPF offload active, potential packet access beyond hardware packet boundary");
return -EBUSY;
}
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h
index d0e17eebddd9..16841bb750b7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/main.h
@@ -560,6 +560,8 @@ bool nfp_is_subprog_start(struct nfp_insn_meta *meta);
void nfp_bpf_jit_prepare(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog);
int nfp_bpf_jit(struct nfp_prog *prog);
bool nfp_bpf_supported_opcode(u8 code);
+bool nfp_bpf_offload_check_mtu(struct nfp_net *nn, struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ unsigned int mtu);
int nfp_verify_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx,
int prev_insn_idx);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c
index 53851853562c..9d97cd281f18 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/offload.c
@@ -481,19 +481,28 @@ int nfp_bpf_event_output(struct nfp_app_bpf *bpf, const void *data,
return 0;
}
+bool nfp_bpf_offload_check_mtu(struct nfp_net *nn, struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ unsigned int mtu)
+{
+ unsigned int fw_mtu, pkt_off;
+
+ fw_mtu = nn_readb(nn, NFP_NET_CFG_BPF_INL_MTU) * 64 - 32;
+ pkt_off = min(prog->aux->max_pkt_offset, mtu);
+
+ return fw_mtu < pkt_off;
+}
+
static int
nfp_net_bpf_load(struct nfp_net *nn, struct bpf_prog *prog,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog = prog->aux->offload->dev_priv;
- unsigned int fw_mtu, pkt_off, max_stack, max_prog_len;
+ unsigned int max_stack, max_prog_len;
dma_addr_t dma_addr;
void *img;
int err;
- fw_mtu = nn_readb(nn, NFP_NET_CFG_BPF_INL_MTU) * 64 - 32;
- pkt_off = min(prog->aux->max_pkt_offset, nn->dp.netdev->mtu);
- if (fw_mtu < pkt_off) {
+ if (nfp_bpf_offload_check_mtu(nn, prog, nn->dp.netdev->mtu)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "BPF offload not supported with potential packet access beyond HW packet split boundary");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists