| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CANP3RGdCBzjWuK8FfHOOKcFAbd_Zru=DkOBBpD3d_PYDR91P5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:50:22 -0700
From: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Linux Network Development Mailing List
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH netfilter] netfilter: conntrack: udp: generate event on
switch to stream timeout
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 2:39 AM Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 02:09:34AM -0700, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> > From: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
> >
> > Without this it's hard to offload udp due to lack of a conntrack event
> > at the appropriate time (ie. once udp stream is established and stream
> > timeout is in effect).
> >
> > Without this udp conntrack events 'update/assured/timeout=30'
> > either need to be ignored, or polling loop needs to be <30 second
> > instead of <120 second.
> >
> > With this change:
> > [NEW] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 [UNREPLIED] src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282
> > [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282
> > [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED]
> > [UPDATE] udp 17 120 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED]
> > [DESTROY] udp 17 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED]
> > (the 3rd update/assured/120 event is new)
>
> Hm, I still don't understand why do you need this extra 3rd
> update/assured event event. Could you explain your usecase?
Currently we populate a flow offload array on the assured event, and
thus the flow in both directions starts bypassing the kernel.
Hence conntrack timeout is no longer automatically refreshed - and
there is no opportunity for the timeout to get bumped to the stream
timeout of 120s - it stays at 30s.
We periodically (every just over 60-ish seconds) check whether packets
on a flow have been offloaded, and if so refresh the conntrack
timeout. This isn't cheap and we don't want to do it even more often.
However this 60s cycle > 30s non-stream udp timeout, so the kernel
conntrack entry expires (and we must thus clear out the flow from the
offload). This results in a broken udp stream - but only on newer
kernels. Older kernels don't have this '2s' wait feature (which makes
a lot of sense btw.) but as a result of this the conntrack assured
event happens at the right time - when the timeout hits 120s (or 180s
on even older kernels).
By generating another assured event when the udp stream is 'confirmed'
and the timeout is boosted from 30s to 120s we have an opportunity to
ignore the first one (with timeout 30) and only populate the offload
on the second one (with timeout 120).
I'm not sure if I'm doing a good job of describing this. Ask again if
it's not clear and I'll try again.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> > Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
> > Fixes: d535c8a69c19 'netfilter: conntrack: udp: only extend timeout to stream mode after 2s'
> > Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h | 1 +
> > .../uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h | 1 +
> > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> > index cc663c68ddc4..12029d616cfa 100644
> > --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> > +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> >
> > struct nf_ct_udp {
> > unsigned long stream_ts;
> > + bool notified;
> > };
> >
> > /* per conntrack: protocol private data */
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> > index 4b3395082d15..a8e91b5821fa 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> > @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ enum ip_conntrack_events {
> > IPCT_SECMARK, /* new security mark has been set */
> > IPCT_LABEL, /* new connlabel has been set */
> > IPCT_SYNPROXY, /* synproxy has been set */
> > + IPCT_UDPSTREAM, /* udp stream has been set */
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> > __IPCT_MAX
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
> > index 68911fcaa0f1..f0d9869aa30f 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
> > @@ -97,18 +97,23 @@ int nf_conntrack_udp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
> > if (!timeouts)
> > timeouts = udp_get_timeouts(nf_ct_net(ct));
> >
> > - if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct))
> > + if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct)) {
> > ct->proto.udp.stream_ts = 2 * HZ + jiffies;
> > + ct->proto.udp.notified = false;
> > + }
> >
> > /* If we've seen traffic both ways, this is some kind of UDP
> > * stream. Set Assured.
> > */
> > if (test_bit(IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT, &ct->status)) {
> > unsigned long extra = timeouts[UDP_CT_UNREPLIED];
> > + bool stream = false;
> >
> > /* Still active after two seconds? Extend timeout. */
> > - if (time_after(jiffies, ct->proto.udp.stream_ts))
> > + if (time_after(jiffies, ct->proto.udp.stream_ts)) {
> > extra = timeouts[UDP_CT_REPLIED];
> > + stream = true;
> > + }
> >
> > nf_ct_refresh_acct(ct, ctinfo, skb, extra);
> >
> > @@ -116,9 +121,16 @@ int nf_conntrack_udp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
> > if (unlikely((ct->status & IPS_NAT_CLASH)))
> > return NF_ACCEPT;
> >
> > + if (stream) {
> > + stream = !ct->proto.udp.notified;
> > + ct->proto.udp.notified = true;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* Also, more likely to be important, and not a probe */
> > if (!test_and_set_bit(IPS_ASSURED_BIT, &ct->status))
> > nf_conntrack_event_cache(IPCT_ASSURED, ct);
> > + else if (stream)
> > + nf_conntrack_event_cache(IPCT_UDPSTREAM, ct);
> > } else {
> > nf_ct_refresh_acct(ct, ctinfo, skb, timeouts[UDP_CT_UNREPLIED]);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.33.0.1079.g6e70778dc9-goog
> >Maciej Żenczykowski, Kernel Networking Developer @ Google
Powered by blists - more mailing lists