netdev - Re: [V2][PATCH] cgroup: fix memory leak caused by missing cgroup_bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YW1vuXh4C4tX9ZHP@T590>
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:59:37 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@...driver.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        mkoutny@...e.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V2][PATCH] cgroup: fix memory leak caused by missing
 cgroup_bpf_offline

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 06:06:28PM +0800, Quanyang Wang wrote:
> Hi Ming,
> 
> On 10/18/21 5:02 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:56:23PM +0800, quanyang.wang@...driver.com wrote:
> > > From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@...driver.com>
> > > 
> > > When enabling CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF, kmemleak can be observed by running
> > > the command as below:
> > > 
> > >      $mount -t cgroup -o none,name=foo cgroup cgroup/
> > >      $umount cgroup/
> > > 
> > > unreferenced object 0xc3585c40 (size 64):
> > >    comm "mount", pid 425, jiffies 4294959825 (age 31.990s)
> > >    hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> > >      01 00 00 80 84 8c 28 c0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ......(.........
> > >      00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 6c 43 a0 c3 00 00 00 00  ........lC......
> > >    backtrace:
> > >      [<e95a2f9e>] cgroup_bpf_inherit+0x44/0x24c
> > >      [<1f03679c>] cgroup_setup_root+0x174/0x37c
> > >      [<ed4b0ac5>] cgroup1_get_tree+0x2c0/0x4a0
> > >      [<f85b12fd>] vfs_get_tree+0x24/0x108
> > >      [<f55aec5c>] path_mount+0x384/0x988
> > >      [<e2d5e9cd>] do_mount+0x64/0x9c
> > >      [<208c9cfe>] sys_mount+0xfc/0x1f4
> > >      [<06dd06e0>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48
> > >      [<a8308cb3>] 0xbeb4daa8
> > > 
> > > This is because that since the commit 2b0d3d3e4fcf ("percpu_ref: reduce
> > > memory footprint of percpu_ref in fast path") root_cgrp->bpf.refcnt.data
> > > is allocated by the function percpu_ref_init in cgroup_bpf_inherit which
> > > is called by cgroup_setup_root when mounting, but not freed along with
> > > root_cgrp when umounting. Adding cgroup_bpf_offline which calls
> > > percpu_ref_kill to cgroup_kill_sb can free root_cgrp->bpf.refcnt.data in
> > > umount path.
> > > 
> > > This patch also fixes the commit 4bfc0bb2c60e ("bpf: decouple the lifetime
> > > of cgroup_bpf from cgroup itself"). A cgroup_bpf_offline is needed to do a
> > > cleanup that frees the resources which are allocated by cgroup_bpf_inherit
> > > in cgroup_setup_root.
> > > 
> > > And inside cgroup_bpf_offline, cgroup_get() is at the beginning and
> > > cgroup_put is at the end of cgroup_bpf_release which is called by
> > > cgroup_bpf_offline. So cgroup_bpf_offline can keep the balance of
> > > cgroup's refcount.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 2b0d3d3e4fcf ("percpu_ref: reduce memory footprint of percpu_ref in fast path")
> > 
> > If I understand correctly, cgroup_bpf_release() won't be called without
> > your patch. So anything allocated in cgroup_bpf_inherit() will be
> > leaked?
> No, for now cgroup_bpf_release is called to release bpf.refcnt.data of the
> cgroup which is not root_cgroup. Only root_cgroup's bpf data is leaked.

You mean that cgroup_bpf_inherit() allocates nothing for root_cgroup?

If yes, I agree you can add 'Fixes: 2b0d3d3e4fcf', otherwise please
remove it.


Thanks, 
Ming