[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211018162142.6739e218@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 16:21:42 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next RESEND PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: qca8k: tidy for loop in
setup and add cpu port check
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 01:14:30 +0200 Ansuel Smith wrote:
> > > So anyway i both send these 2 patch as a dedicated patch with the
> > > absent tag.
> >
> > Ah! I see the first posting of both now, looks like patchwork realized
> > it's a repost of patch 1 so it marked that as superseded.
>
> Should I resend just that with the correct tag?
Please fetch the latest net-next/master, and rebase your branch with
these changes. git will figure out what's already applied. Resend the
rest as [PATCH net-next v2].
Powered by blists - more mailing lists