[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211018114841.g6lhqmhjj5dkddqm@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:48:41 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: rcar: Drop unneeded ARM dependency
On 18.10.2021 13:34:34, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 3:32 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > On 31.08.2021 15:27:40, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > The dependency on ARM predates the dependency on ARCH_RENESAS.
> > > The latter was introduced for Renesas arm64 SoCs first, and later
> > > extended to cover Renesas ARM SoCs, too.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> >
> > Applied to linux-can-next/testing.
>
> Thanks!
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/log/?h=testing
> still predates my patch. Am I looking at the wrong tree?
I've just updated the branch.
I'm working on can-next patches while waiting on other things, and I'm
not finished yet, so I haven't pushed it until now. More updates and
probably rebases will be done to the testing branch.
Regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists