[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8b9b95a-d7e3-53ad-cf87-9bb6f1610c5a@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:44:36 +0800
From: "huangguangbin (A)" <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <mkubecek@...e.cz>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
<amitc@...lanox.com>, <idosch@...sch.org>, <danieller@...dia.com>,
<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
<jdike@...toit.com>, <richard@....at>,
<anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, <netanel@...zon.com>,
<akiyano@...zon.com>, <gtzalik@...zon.com>, <saeedb@...zon.com>,
<chris.snook@...il.com>, <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <jeroendb@...gle.com>,
<csully@...gle.com>, <awogbemila@...gle.com>, <jdmason@...zu.us>,
<rain.1986.08.12@...il.com>, <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
<kys@...rosoft.com>, <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, <mst@...hat.com>,
<jasowang@...hat.com>, <doshir@...are.com>,
<pv-drivers@...are.com>, <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>,
<kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>, <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
<johannes@...solutions.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <lipeng321@...wei.com>,
<chenhao288@...ilicon.com>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 1/6] ethtool: add support to set/get tx
copybreak buf size via ethtool
On 2021/10/14 21:58, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/21 4:39 AM, Guangbin Huang wrote:
>> From: Hao Chen <chenhao288@...ilicon.com>
>>
>> Add support for ethtool to set/get tx copybreak buf size.
>
> What is the unit ?
>
> Frankly, having to size the 'buffer' based on number of slots in TX ring buffer
> is not good.
>
> What happens later when/if ethtool -G tx xxxxx' is trying
> to change number of slots ?
>
> The 'tx copybreak' should instead give a number of bytes per TX ring slot.
>
> Eg, 128 or 256 bytes.
>
> This is very similar to what drivers using net/core/tso.c do.
>
> They usually use TSO_HEADER_SIZE for this.
>
Hi Eric,
The unit is bytes.
Tx copybreak buf is a queue based tx shared bounce buffer and it is allocated
based on page size, not based on slot numbers. When the len of xmitted skb is
below tx_copybreak, tx copybreak buf will share buffer of specific size(slot size)
for tx to memcpy the small packet.
So, what you mentioned seems not related to this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Chen <chenhao288@...ilicon.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h | 1 +
>> net/ethtool/common.c | 1 +
>> net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
>> index a2223b685451..7bc4b8def12c 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
>> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ enum tunable_id {
>> ETHTOOL_RX_COPYBREAK,
>> ETHTOOL_TX_COPYBREAK,
>> ETHTOOL_PFC_PREVENTION_TOUT, /* timeout in msecs */
>> + ETHTOOL_TX_COPYBREAK_BUF_SIZE,
>> /*
>> * Add your fresh new tunable attribute above and remember to update
>> * tunable_strings[] in net/ethtool/common.c
>> diff --git a/net/ethtool/common.c b/net/ethtool/common.c
>> index c63e0739dc6a..0c5210015911 100644
>> --- a/net/ethtool/common.c
>> +++ b/net/ethtool/common.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ tunable_strings[__ETHTOOL_TUNABLE_COUNT][ETH_GSTRING_LEN] = {
>> [ETHTOOL_RX_COPYBREAK] = "rx-copybreak",
>> [ETHTOOL_TX_COPYBREAK] = "tx-copybreak",
>> [ETHTOOL_PFC_PREVENTION_TOUT] = "pfc-prevention-tout",
>> + [ETHTOOL_TX_COPYBREAK_BUF_SIZE] = "tx-copybreak-buf-size",
>> };
>>
>> const char
>> diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
>> index bf6e8c2f9bf7..617ebc4183d9 100644
>> --- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
>> @@ -2383,6 +2383,7 @@ static int ethtool_tunable_valid(const struct ethtool_tunable *tuna)
>> switch (tuna->id) {
>> case ETHTOOL_RX_COPYBREAK:
>> case ETHTOOL_TX_COPYBREAK:
>> + case ETHTOOL_TX_COPYBREAK_BUF_SIZE:
>> if (tuna->len != sizeof(u32) ||
>> tuna->type_id != ETHTOOL_TUNABLE_U32)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists