[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211019125513.4e522af9.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:55:13 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>
Cc: <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <jgg@...dia.com>, <saeedm@...dia.com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <leonro@...dia.com>,
<kwankhede@...dia.com>, <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>, <maorg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 mlx5-next 14/14] vfio/mlx5: Use its own PCI
reset_done error handler
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:58:38 +0300
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com> wrote:
> Register its own handler for pci_error_handlers.reset_done and update
> state accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> index 621b7fc60544..b759c6e153b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct mlx5vf_pci_core_device {
> /* protect migartion state */
> struct mutex state_mutex;
> struct mlx5vf_pci_migration_info vmig;
> + struct work_struct work;
> };
>
> static int mlx5vf_pci_unquiesce_device(struct mlx5vf_pci_core_device *mvdev)
> @@ -615,6 +616,27 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops mlx5vf_pci_ops = {
> .match = vfio_pci_core_match,
> };
>
> +static void mlx5vf_reset_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct mlx5vf_pci_core_device *mvdev =
> + container_of(work, struct mlx5vf_pci_core_device, work);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&mvdev->state_mutex);
> + mlx5vf_reset_mig_state(mvdev);
I see this calls mlx5vf_reset_vhca_state() but how does that unfreeze
and unquiesce the device as necessary to get back to _RUNNING?
> + mvdev->vmig.vfio_dev_state = VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING;
> + mutex_unlock(&mvdev->state_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void mlx5vf_pci_aer_reset_done(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct mlx5vf_pci_core_device *mvdev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + if (!mvdev->migrate_cap)
> + return;
> +
> + schedule_work(&mvdev->work);
This seems troublesome, how long does userspace poll the device state
after reset to get back to _RUNNING? Seems we at least need a
flush_work() call when userspace reads the device state. Thanks,
Alex
> +}
> +
> static int mlx5vf_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> const struct pci_device_id *id)
> {
> @@ -634,6 +656,8 @@ static int mlx5vf_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(mdev, migration)) {
> mvdev->migrate_cap = 1;
> mutex_init(&mvdev->state_mutex);
> + INIT_WORK(&mvdev->work,
> + mlx5vf_reset_work_handler);
> }
> mlx5_vf_put_core_dev(mdev);
> }
> @@ -656,6 +680,8 @@ static void mlx5vf_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct mlx5vf_pci_core_device *mvdev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>
> + if (mvdev->migrate_cap)
> + cancel_work_sync(&mvdev->work);
> vfio_pci_core_unregister_device(&mvdev->core_device);
> vfio_pci_core_uninit_device(&mvdev->core_device);
> kfree(mvdev);
> @@ -668,12 +694,17 @@ static const struct pci_device_id mlx5vf_pci_table[] = {
>
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, mlx5vf_pci_table);
>
> +const struct pci_error_handlers mlx5vf_err_handlers = {
> + .reset_done = mlx5vf_pci_aer_reset_done,
> + .error_detected = vfio_pci_aer_err_detected,
> +};
> +
> static struct pci_driver mlx5vf_pci_driver = {
> .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> .id_table = mlx5vf_pci_table,
> .probe = mlx5vf_pci_probe,
> .remove = mlx5vf_pci_remove,
> - .err_handler = &vfio_pci_core_err_handlers,
> + .err_handler = &mlx5vf_err_handlers,
> };
>
> static void __exit mlx5vf_pci_cleanup(void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists