netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net] net: bridge: mcast: QRI must be less than QI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YXAHHBYtFfXbd1hE@Laptop-X1>
Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:10:04 +0800
From:   Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
        roopa@...dia.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] net: bridge: mcast: QRI must be less than QI

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 06:19:25PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:49:17PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > Nacked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
> > 
> > I think we just discussed this a day ago? It is the same problem -
> > while we all agree the values should follow the RFC, users have had
> > the option to set any values forever (even non-RFC compliant ones).
> > This change risks breaking user-space.
> 
> OK, I misunderstood your reply in last mail. I thought you only object to
> disabling no meaning values(e.g. set timer to 0, which not is forbid by the
> RFC). I don't know you also reject to follow a *MUST* rule defined in the RFC.

I know you denied the patch due to user-space compatibility. Forgive me
if my last reply sound a little aggressive.

Thanks
Hangbin