[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXAcGtxe08XiHBFH@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:39:38 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
Cc: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>, kys@...rosoft.com,
haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
jroedel@...e.de, brijesh.singh@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
pgonda@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, rppt@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, saravanand@...com, hannes@...xchg.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
vkuznets@...hat.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hch@....de,
robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, parri.andrea@...il.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sev-es: Expose __sev_es_ghcb_hv_call() to call ghcb
hv call out of sev code
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 08:39:59PM +0800, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> Hyper-V runs paravisor in guest VMPL0 which emulates some functions
> (e.g, timer, tsc, serial console and so on) via handling VC exception.
> GHCB pages are allocated and set up by the paravisor and report to Linux
> guest via MSR register.Hyper-V SEV implementation is unenlightened guest
> case which doesn't Linux doesn't handle VC and paravisor in the VMPL0
> handle it.
Aha, unenlightened.
So why don't you export the original function by doing this (only
partial diff to show intent only):
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
index f1d513897baf..bfe82f58508f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static enum es_result verify_exception_info(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt
return ES_VMM_ERROR;
}
-static enum es_result sev_es_ghcb_hv_call(struct ghcb *ghcb,
+static enum es_result sev_es_ghcb_hv_call(struct ghcb *ghcb, bool set_ghcb_msr,
struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt,
u64 exit_code, u64 exit_info_1,
u64 exit_info_2)
@@ -138,7 +138,14 @@ static enum es_result sev_es_ghcb_hv_call(struct ghcb *ghcb,
ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_1(ghcb, exit_info_1);
ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(ghcb, exit_info_2);
- sev_es_wr_ghcb_msr(__pa(ghcb));
+ /*
+ * Hyper-V unenlightened guests use a paravisor for communicating and
+ * GHCB pages are being allocated by that paravisor which uses a
+ * different MSR and protocol.
+ */
+ if (set_ghcb_msr)
+ sev_es_wr_ghcb_msr(__pa(ghcb));
+
VMGEXIT();
return verify_exception_info(ghcb, ctxt);
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists