lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKH8qBt5dLs8UN4YnRj7mkG2KmqrRKLj5QTGdFZ-OKDkz+vkwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:22:03 -0700
From:   Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] libbpf: use func name when pinning
 programs with LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:14 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:15 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit 15669e1dcd75 ("selftests/bpf: Normalize all the rest SEC() uses")
> > broke flow dissector tests. With the strict section names, bpftool isn't
> > able to pin all programs of the objects (all section names are the
> > same now). To bring it back to life let's do the following:
> >
> > - teach libbpf to pin by func name with LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME
> > - enable strict mode in bpftool (breaking cli change)
> > - fix custom flow_dissector loader to use strict mode
> > - fix flow_dissector tests to use new pin names (func vs sec)
> >
> > v2:
> > - add github issue (Andrii Nakryiko)
> > - remove sec_name from bpf_program.pin_name comment (Andrii Nakryiko)
> > - clarify program pinning in LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME (Andrii Nakryiko)
>
> I could not find this, can you please point me to where this is
> clarified/explained in your patches?

Sorry, I don't see it either. I remember I've added some comment to
LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME in tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_legacy.h but I don't
see it in the paches / my local tree. Will add back and resend.

>
> > - add cover letter (Andrii Nakryiko)
> >
> > Stanislav Fomichev (3):
> >   libbpf: use func name when pinning programs with
> >     LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME
> >   bpftool: don't append / to the progtype
> >   selftests/bpf: fix flow dissector tests
> >
> >  tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c                       |  4 ++++
> >  tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c                       | 15 +--------------
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                         | 10 ++++++++--
> >  .../selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c        | 18 +++++++++++-------
> >  .../selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.h        | 10 ++--------
> >  .../selftests/bpf/test_flow_dissector.sh       | 10 +++++-----
> >  6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ