[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKH8qBsKJ0VU=FbVmeznBduwUFnYK0of_ybpxR0Su=+U_Escyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:36:01 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] bpftool: don't append / to the progtype
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 3:21 AM Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com> wrote:
>
> 2021-10-20 15:50 UTC-0700 ~ Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> > Otherwise, attaching with bpftool doesn't work with strict section names.
> >
> > Also, switch to libbpf strict mode to use the latest conventions
> > (note, I don't think we have any cli api guarantees?).
>
> We've been trying to avoid breaking the command line arguments so far.
> With your patch, there are several types that would need a '/' appended
> to the command line argument. As far as I can tell, these are:
>
> kprobe
> kretprobe
> uprobe
> uretprobe
> tracepoint
> raw_tracepoint
> tp
> raw_tp
> xdp_devmap
> xdp_cpumap
>
> (Libbpf requires a '/' for a few other types, but bpftool does not
> support loading programs of such types at this time.)
>
> And I find it a bit strange to pass the trailing slash on the command line:
>
> # bpftool prog load ret1.o /sys/fs/bpf/ret1 type kprobe/
>
> Would it be possible to maintain the current syntax? Maybe by keeping a
> list of types that need the trailing '/', or by making a second attempt
> with the '/' when libbpf complains that it failed to guess the program type?
Sounds good! I can leave existing code and add a retry without '/' to
enable strict mode.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists