lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJRUz81YeBqM-Kk4OM7FXAw07TNA_mOY1ZGAZ5MHpsE2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 18:22:24 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Cc:     Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
        Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Fix up bpf_jit_limit some more

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:26 AM Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com> wrote:
>
> Fix some inconsistencies of bpf_jit_limit on non-x86 platforms.
> I've dropped exposing bpf_jit_current since we couldn't agree on
> file modes, correct names, etc.

Applied to bpf tree. Seems more appropriate there.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ