[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211025122000.7da7eaaf@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:20:00 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: convert users of bitmap_foo() to
linkmode_foo()
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 20:50:45 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 06:41:04PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > This converts instances of
> > bitmap_foo(args..., __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS)
> > to
> > linkmode_foo(args...)
>
> It does touch a lot of files, but it does help keep the API uniform.
>
> > I manually fixed up some lines to prevent them from being excessively
> > long. Otherwise, this change was generated with the following semantic
> > patch:
>
> How many did you fix?
Strange, I thought coccinelle does pretty well on checkpatch compliance.
> > Because this touches so many files in the net tree, you may want to
> > generate a new diff using the semantic patch above when you apply this.
>
> If it still applies cleanly, i would just apply it.
It seems to apply but does not build (missing include in mlx4?)
> Otherwise maybe Jakub could recreate it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists