lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6178131635190015@myt6-af0b0b987ed8.qloud-c.yandex.net>
Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 22:26:55 +0300
From:   Alexander Azimov <mitradir@...dex-team.ru>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     zeil@...dex-team.ru, Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>,
        Akhmat Karakotov <hmukos@...dex-team.ru>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re:[PATCH] tcp: Use BPF timeout setting for SYN ACK RTO

Hi Eric,
 
Can you please clarify why do you think that SYN RTO should be accessible through BPF and SYN ACK RTO should be bound to TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT constant?
I can't see the reason for such asymmetry, please advise.
 
I also wonder what kind of existing BPF programs can suffer from these changes. Please give us your insights.

ps: this is a copy of the original message, hope this one will come in a plain text

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ