[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202110251411.93B477676B@keescook>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:14:36 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, arnaldo.melo@...il.com,
pmladek@...e.com, peterz@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
valentin.schneider@....com, qiang.zhang@...driver.com,
robdclark@...omium.org, christian@...uner.io,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com,
mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com, dledford@...hat.com,
jgg@...pe.ca, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oliver.sang@...el.com, lkp@...el.com,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vzapolskiy@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/12] drivers/connector: make connector comm always
nul ternimated
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 08:33:06AM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote:
> connector comm was introduced in commit
> f786ecba4158 ("connector: add comm change event report to proc connector").
> struct comm_proc_event was defined in include/linux/cn_proc.h first and
> then been moved into file include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h in commit
> 607ca46e97a1 ("UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate include/linux").
>
> As this is the UAPI code, we can't change it without potentially breaking
> things (i.e. userspace binaries have this size built in, so we can't just
> change the size). To prepare for the followup change - extending task
> comm, we have to use __get_task_comm() to avoid the BUILD_BUG_ON() in
> proc_comm_connector().
I wonder, looking at this again, if it might make more sense to avoid
this cn_proc.c change, and instead, adjust get_task_comm() like so:
#define get_task_comm(buf, tsk)
__get_task_comm(buf, __must_be_array(buf) + sizeof(buf), tsk)
This would still enforce the original goal of making sure
get_task_comm() is being used on a char array, and now that
__get_task_comm() will truncate & pad, it's safe to use on both
too-small and too-big arrays.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists