[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXfulitQY1+Gd35h@krava>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:03:34 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Fix BTF data for modules
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:54:48PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 5:05 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> > I'm trying to enable BTF for kernel module in fedora,
> > and I'm getting big increase on modules sizes on s390x arch.
> >
> > Size of modules in total - kernel dir under /lib/modules/VER/
> > from kernel-core and kernel-module packages:
> >
> > current new
> > aarch64 60M 76M
> > ppc64le 53M 66M
> > s390x 21M 41M
> > x86_64 64M 79M
> >
> > The reason for higher increase on s390x was that dedup algorithm
> > did not detect some of the big kernel structs like 'struct module',
> > so they are duplicated in the kernel module BTF data. The s390x
> > has many small modules that increased significantly in size because
> > of that even after compression.
> >
> > First issues was that the '--btf_gen_floats' option is not passed
> > to pahole for kernel module BTF generation.
> >
> > The other problem is more tricky and is the reason why this patchset
> > is RFC ;-)
> >
> > The s390x compiler generates multiple definitions of the same struct
> > and dedup algorithm does not seem to handle this at the moment.
> >
> > I put the debuginfo and btf dump of the s390x pnet.ko module in here:
> > http://people.redhat.com/~jolsa/kmodbtf/
> >
> > Please let me know if you'd like to see other info/files.
> >
>
> Hard to tell what's going on without vmlinux itself. Can you upload a
> corresponding kernel image with BTF in it?
sure, uploaded
jirka
>
> > I found code in dedup that seems to handle such situation for arrays,
> > and added 'some' fix for structs. With that change I can no longer
> > see vmlinux's structs in kernel module BTF data, but I have no idea
> > if that breaks anything else.
> >
> > thoughts? thanks,
> > jirka
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Jiri Olsa (2):
> > kbuild: Unify options for BTF generation for vmlinux and modules
> > bpf: Add support to detect and dedup instances of same structs
> >
> > Makefile | 3 +++
> > scripts/Makefile.modfinal | 2 +-
> > scripts/link-vmlinux.sh | 11 +----------
> > scripts/pahole-flags.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100755 scripts/pahole-flags.sh
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists