lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37b26090-945f-1e17-f6ab-52552a4b6d89@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 17:42:54 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/15] dt-bindings: add pwrseq device tree bindings

On 26/10/2021 15:53, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:53:53AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> Add device tree bindings for the new power sequencer subsystem.
>> Consumers would reference pwrseq nodes using "foo-pwrseq" properties.
>> Providers would use '#pwrseq-cells' property to declare the amount of
>> cells in the pwrseq specifier.
> 
> Please use get_maintainers.pl.
> 
> This is not a pattern I want to encourage, so NAK on a common binding.


Could you please spend a few more words, describing what is not 
encouraged? The whole foo-subsys/#subsys-cells structure?

Or just specifying the common binding?

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/power/pwrseq/pwrseq.yaml         | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pwrseq/pwrseq.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pwrseq/pwrseq.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pwrseq/pwrseq.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..4a8f6c0218bf
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pwrseq/pwrseq.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/power/pwrseq/pwrseq.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Power Sequencer devices
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  "#powerseq-cells":
>> +    description:
>> +      Number of cells in a pwrseq specifier.
>> +
>> +patternProperties:
>> +  ".*-pwrseq$":
>> +    description: Power sequencer supply phandle(s) for this node
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: true
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    qca_pwrseq: qca-pwrseq {
>> +      #pwrseq-cells = <1>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    bluetooth {
>> +      bt-pwrseq = <&qca_pwrseq 1>;
>> +    };
>> +...
>> -- 
>> 2.33.0
>>
>>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ