[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbaD60KFsUB4VkTAH2v3+GFkRvRbY_O-bNSpNG0=8pJ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 21:54:48 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Fix BTF data for modules
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 5:05 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> hi,
> I'm trying to enable BTF for kernel module in fedora,
> and I'm getting big increase on modules sizes on s390x arch.
>
> Size of modules in total - kernel dir under /lib/modules/VER/
> from kernel-core and kernel-module packages:
>
> current new
> aarch64 60M 76M
> ppc64le 53M 66M
> s390x 21M 41M
> x86_64 64M 79M
>
> The reason for higher increase on s390x was that dedup algorithm
> did not detect some of the big kernel structs like 'struct module',
> so they are duplicated in the kernel module BTF data. The s390x
> has many small modules that increased significantly in size because
> of that even after compression.
>
> First issues was that the '--btf_gen_floats' option is not passed
> to pahole for kernel module BTF generation.
>
> The other problem is more tricky and is the reason why this patchset
> is RFC ;-)
>
> The s390x compiler generates multiple definitions of the same struct
> and dedup algorithm does not seem to handle this at the moment.
>
> I put the debuginfo and btf dump of the s390x pnet.ko module in here:
> http://people.redhat.com/~jolsa/kmodbtf/
>
> Please let me know if you'd like to see other info/files.
>
Hard to tell what's going on without vmlinux itself. Can you upload a
corresponding kernel image with BTF in it?
> I found code in dedup that seems to handle such situation for arrays,
> and added 'some' fix for structs. With that change I can no longer
> see vmlinux's structs in kernel module BTF data, but I have no idea
> if that breaks anything else.
>
> thoughts? thanks,
> jirka
>
>
> ---
> Jiri Olsa (2):
> kbuild: Unify options for BTF generation for vmlinux and modules
> bpf: Add support to detect and dedup instances of same structs
>
> Makefile | 3 +++
> scripts/Makefile.modfinal | 2 +-
> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh | 11 +----------
> scripts/pahole-flags.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 scripts/pahole-flags.sh
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists