netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: bridge: provide shim definition for br_vlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 22:28:12 +0300
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: bridge: provide shim definition for
 br_vlan_flags

On 27/10/2021 19:21, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> br_vlan_replay() needs this, and we're preparing to move it to
> br_switchdev.c, which will be compiled regardless of whether or not
> CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_private.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 3c9327628060..cc31c3fe1e02 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -1708,6 +1708,11 @@ static inline bool br_vlan_can_enter_range(const struct net_bridge_vlan *v_curr,
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +static inline u16 br_vlan_flags(const struct net_bridge_vlan *v, u16 pvid)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int br_vlan_replay(struct net_device *br_dev,
>  				 struct net_device *dev, const void *ctx,
>  				 bool adding, struct notifier_block *nb,
> 

hm, shouldn't the vlan replay be a shim if bridge vlans are not defined?
I.e. shouldn't this rather be turned into br_vlan_replay's shim?

TBH, I haven't looked into the details just wonder why we would compile all that vlan
code if bridge vlan filtering is not enabled.

Thanks,
 Nik