netdev - Re: pull-request: bpf 2021-10-26

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bl3a9lc5.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:03:38 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     kuba@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org,
        andrii.nakryiko@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: pull-request: bpf 2021-10-26

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> writes:

> The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.
>
> We've added 12 non-merge commits during the last 7 day(s) which contain
> a total of 23 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-).

Hi Daniel

Any chance we could also get bpf merged into bpf-next? We'd like to use
this fix:

> 1) Fix potential race window in BPF tail call compatibility check,
> from Toke Høiland-Jørgensen.

in the next version of the XDP multi-buf submission without creating
merge conflicts. Or is there some other way we can achieve this without
creating more work for you? :)

-Toke