[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211027085208.16048-4-tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:52:09 +0800
From: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, jacob.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, guwen@...ux.alibaba.com,
dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH net 3/4] net/smc: Correct spelling mistake to TCPF_SYN_RECV
From: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
There should use TCPF_SYN_RECV instead of TCP_SYN_RECV.
Fixes: 50717a37db03 ("net/smc: nonblocking connect rework")
Cc: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <tony.ly@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index c038efc23ce3..78b663dbfa1f 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ static void smc_connect_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (smc->clcsock->sk->sk_err) {
smc->sk.sk_err = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_err;
} else if ((1 << smc->clcsock->sk->sk_state) &
- (TCPF_SYN_SENT | TCP_SYN_RECV)) {
+ (TCPF_SYN_SENT | TCPF_SYN_RECV)) {
rc = sk_stream_wait_connect(smc->clcsock->sk, &timeo);
if ((rc == -EPIPE) &&
((1 << smc->clcsock->sk->sk_state) &
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists