[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKKDMh26yqyR2hYB4CCbbgKH2_LaQQCStmNM1-R0_R8xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:57:50 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: Asad Sajjad Ahmed <asadsa@....uio.no>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com>,
Tom Henderson <tomh@...h.org>,
Bob Briscoe <research@...briscoe.net>,
Olga Albisser <olga@...isser.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] fq_codel: avoid under-utilization with
ce_threshold at low link rates
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 7:53 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> Setting ce_threshold to 1ms while the link rate is 12Mbs sounds
> misconfiguration to me.
>
It is like using a ce_threshold of 1usec on a 10Gbit link.
About all packets would get CE marked.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists